Skip To Main Content

How should individuals with positive T1D autoantibodies be monitored over time?

Individuals who screen positive for ≥1 autoimmune islet cell antibodies need periodic medical monitoring, which includes regular assessments of blood glucose and HbA1c levels. You can also educate them about symptoms of diabetes, diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), and provide psychosocial support to prepare them for a possible clinical diagnosis for type 1 diabetes (T1D).1



What are the next steps for individuals who test positive for T1D autoantibodies?

A positive screening for presence of ≥2 T1D antibodies indicate that the individual is in presymptomatic stage of T1D.2 As per the latest consensus guidance, such individuals need metabolic monitoring for the presence of glucose abnormalities, an indicator of disease progression.1,3,4

Presence of dysglycaemia, (fasting plasma glucose ≥100 mg/dL [≥5.6 mmol/L], 2-hour plasma glucose with 75 gm OGTT ≥140 mg/dL [≥7.8 mmol/L], 30/60/90 min glucose ≥200 mg/dL [≥11.1 mmol/L], and/or HbA1c ≥5.7% [≥39 mmol/mol]), in individuals who test positive for ≥2 T1D antibodies indicate Stage 2 T1D.3 Individuals in this stage have a 100% risk of progressing to symptomatic Stage 3 T1D within the next 15 years.2 At this stage (Stage 2) you can provide such individuals and their caregivers the relevant disease-related education and psychosocial support needed to prepare for a possible Stage 3 T1D diagnosis.4,5



What is the purpose of monitoring T1D autoantibodies and glycaemia?

The primary purpose of monitoring individuals with positive screening results for T1D antibodies is to potentially lower the risk of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) at Stage 3 T1D diagnosis.1 DKA is a life-threatening condition which is associated with need for hospital admission and potential long-term complications.1 A lower risk of DKA is associated with lower incidence of severe hypoglycaemic events within 10 years post diagnosis.1  Regular medical monitoring, including monitoring glucose abnormalities, will help identify disease progression early on.1,4

Timely monitoring that helps in the early detection of Stage 3 T1D can enable you to promptly initiate early insulin therapy which will help to optimise HbA1c and potentially avoid long-term consequences of prolonged hyperglycaemia.1 Monitoring further avoids misdiagnosis of type 2 diabetes and delay in treatment, and also it may increase patient referrals to clinical trials where appropriate.1



Should you follow specific algorithms and tools to monitor individuals who test positive for T1D autoantibodies?

Monitoring of individuals who screened positive for islet autoantibodies can be largely divided into the two categories:

  • Repeat antibody testing: Once an individual tests positive, the second confirmatory test should be done within 3 months.1 A persistent presence of >1 autoantibody indicates presymptomatic Stage 1 T1D.1 Repeat periodic assessments confirming presence of ≥2 autoantibodies along with onset of dysglycaemia indicates progression of disease to Stage 2 T1D.1 
  • Metabolic monitoring: Choose from multiple available tools, such as regular oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), random venous or capillary blood glucose, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), HbA1c testing or self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG).1 Testing C-peptide can help you assess measure of beta-cell function and distinguish stages of T1D.1

A detailed description of the methods used for metabolic monitoring is provided in the table below.

Metric Pros Cons Information gained
Oral glucose tolerance test
(OGTT)4
  • Gold standard
  • Used to stage disease and predict progression
  • Requires glucose
    load and 2 to 5 blood draws over 2 hours
  • Glycaemic staging
  • Risk scores for progression
  • (DPTRS, DPTRS60,
    Index60, M120)
Random venous glucose⁴,
  • One-off sample
  • Low cost
  • Requires a blood draw
  • Similar to 2-hour OGTT-derived glucose
HbA1c⁴
  • Highly specific
  • Can use capillary sample
  • Insensitive, often normal in asymptomatic or recent onset Stage 3 diabetes
  • May be affected by disease states
  • Risk of progression to “clinical disease”: HbA1c or 10% rise over 3–12 months
Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM)
  • Use at home
  • Optimal duration and frequency of CGM wear not yet determined
  • Cost and access issues
  • Risk of progression to “clinical disease”: 10% >7.8 mmol/L (>140 mg/dl)
  • Realtime monitoring over 24 hours
Self monitoring blood glucose (SMBG)⁴
  • Simple use at home
  • Optimal timing and frequency have not been determined
  • Unconfirmed glucose values
  • Immediate result

At any point of monitoring if you observe onset of hyperglycaemia along with other clinical symptoms such as polyuria, polydipsia, weight loss, fatigue, hunger, blurry vision, and diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), it indicates disease progression to symptomatic Stage 3 T1D.1
 

The consensus guidance published in June 2024 provides a detailed algorithm for monitoring of individuals who have been screened positive for islet autoantibodies.1 Below figure illustrates an algorithm for monitoring of people screened positive for ≥2 islet autoantibodies.1

Decision path for monitoring of individuals screened positive for ≥1 islet autoantibodies1

Adapted from Phillip M, Achenbach P, Addala A, et al. Consensus guidance for monitoring individuals with islet autoantibody-positive pre-stage 3 type 1 diabetes. Diabetologia. Published online June 24, 2024.

*Monitoring frequency and methodology depends on age, length of time since first detection of islet autoantibody, number of islet autoantibodies detected and presence of symptoms of type 1 diabetes.

Ab, antibody; GP, general practitioner; PRN, pro re nata  (as needed); Sx, symptoms; T1D, type 1 diabetes

Are there any differences in metabolic monitoring approach in children versus adults?

Progression of T1D among islet autoantibody-positive adults is slower than children, which is why there are minor variations in monitoring approaches.1 You can follow a more frequent metabolic monitoring for children compared to adults.1 Also, children who have progressed to Stage 2 T1D need to be followed up in a specialty care setting.1 Refer to the figure below for more details.



Where should the monitoring be conducted?

Monitoring should be conducted wherever there are the necessary skills and resources to perform the required tests. Early stage (Stage 1 T1D) monitoring can be done in primary-care setting. As soon as you observe indicators of progression of disease to Stage 2 T1D i.e. onset of glucose abnormalities, consider referring to specialty care provider.1 

Monitoring individuals who test positive for T1D antibodies is crucial to reduce the risk of DKA and minimise the need for emergency care and hospitalisation1

21-OH, 21-hydroxylase; ADA, American Diabetes Association; AACE, American Association of Clinical Endocrinology; ACD, Australian Centre for Diabetes; ADCES, Association of Diabetes Care & Education Specialists; ADS, Australian Diabetes Society; ATTD, Advanced Technologies & Treatments for Diabetes; C-peptide, connecting peptide; CGM, continuous glucose monitoring; DKA, diabetic ketoacidosis; EASD, European Association for the Study of Diabetes; EMA, European Medicines Agency; HbA1c, haemoglobin A1c;  IAb, islet autoantibodies; ISPAD, International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes; JDRF, Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation; OGTT, oral glucose tolerance test; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; SMBG, self-monitoring of blood glucose; T1D, type 1 diabetes; TTG, transglutaminase.

  1. Phillip M, Achenbach P, Addala A, et al. Consensus guidance for monitoring individuals with islet autoantibody-positive pre-stage 3 type 1 diabetes. Diabetologia. Published online June 24, 2024. doi:10.1007/s00125-024-06205-5
  2. Mameli C, Triolo TM, Chiarelli F, Rewers M, Zuccotti G, Simmons KM. Lessons and gaps in the prediction and prevention of type 1 diabetes. Pharmacol Res. 2023;193:106792. doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2023.106792
  3. Insel RA, Dunne JL, Atkinson MA, et al. Staging presymptomatic type 1 diabetes: a scientific statement of JDRF, the Endocrine Society, and the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(10):1964-1974. doi:10.2337/dc15-1419
  4. Besser REJ, Bell KJ, Couper JJ, et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: Stages of type 1 diabetes in children and adolescents. Pediatr Diabetes. 2022;23(8):1175-1187
  5. Greenbaum CJ. A Key to T1D Prevention: Screening and Monitoring Relatives as Part of Clinical Care. Diabetes. 2021;70(5):1029-1037. doi:10.2337/db20-1112
  6. Helminen O, Aspholm S, Pokka T, et al. OGTT and random plasma glucose in the prediction of type 1 diabetes and time to diagnosis. Diabetologia. 2015;58(8):1787-1796.
MAT-AU-2502531 - 1.0 - 04/2026