Skip To Main Content

ODYSSEY data mining

In a data mining study of over 3,000 patients* with ASCVD and comorbidities but no prior ACS or stroke, PRALUENT significantly reduced LDL-C levels vs. placebo (n=963) and was generally well tolerated.1

Read the full publication →

Watch Prof Perrone-Filardi's summary of the study:

Study background

  • All patients with ASCVD are at very high or extreme risk of a potentially fatal CV event2
  • LDL-C is the primary target for CV risk reduction and PCSK9 inhibitors such as PRALUENT can reduce LDL-C levels when used alone or in combination with statins2,3+
  • However, data on the effect of PCSK9 inhibitors on CV risk in patients with ASCVD without prior ACS or stroke are limited1
  • This post hoc pooled analysis sought to determine the efficacy and safety of PRALUENT in ASCVD patients who had not previously experienced a CV event1

Study Details

Design

  • Pooled analysis of safety and efficacy data mined from 12 existing ODYSSEY phase 3 studies with PRALUENT

Objective

  • To determine the efficacy and safety of PRALUENT vs. placebo or ezetimibe in patients with ASCVD and comorbidities, but without previous ACS (myocardial infarction/unstable angina) or stroke!

Study groups

  • Efficacy data were analysed in three pools:
    • Pool 1: PRALUENT 75/150 mg Q2W vs. ezetimibe
    • Pool 2: PRALUENT 75/150 mg QZW vs. placebo
    • Pool 3: PRALUENT 150 mg Q2W vs. placebo
  • Safety endpoints were analysed in Pool 1 and in Pools 2 and 3 combined!
  • Primary endpoints

    • Efficacy: Percentage change in calculated LDL-C level from baseline to Week 24
    • Safety: Percentage of patients who experience TEAs

    Population

    • Adults with documented ASCVD, clinical or unequivocal on imaging, and without prior ACS or stroke1
    • Subgroups of interest that were also investigated were PAD + diabetes, CAD + diabetes and clinically established CAD™

    What is data mining?

    Data mining refers to the process of extracting potentially useful information, such as patterns or relationships, from large and complex datasets.4

    Which ODYSSEY studies were mined?1

    • ALTERNATIVE
    • CHOICE II
    • COMBO I
    • COMBO II
    • DM INSULIN
    • FH I
    • FH II
    • HIGH FH
    • LONG TERM
    • MONO
    • OPTIONS I
    • OPTIONS II

    Want to learn more about PRALUENT?

    Click here to find out more →

    Key baseline characteristics1

    Adapted from Castro Cabezas et al. 2025.

    Can you recognise very high- and extreme-risk patients like these in your practice?

    Find out more here →

    Efficacy results

    Primary endpoint: PRALUENT demonstrated significant LDL-C reduction vs. placebo at leek 24 in ASCVD patients without previous ACS or stroke:1,*

    Absolute change in calculated LDL-C at Week 24 was -71.7 mg/dL for PRALUENT and -1.5 mg/dL for placebo.1

    The administration of PRALUENT resulted in a significantly greater reduction in LDL-C levels at Week 24 across all three pools:

    Change in LDL-C levels from baseline to Week 24 per study group (ITT population)1

    Adapted from Castro Cabezas et al. 2025.

    Secondary endpoints: from baseline to Week 12, PRALUENT was associated with a significant improvement in the percentage change in calculated LDL-C levels, ApoB and Lp(a) vs. ezetimibe or placebo1

    Least squared mean difference vs. placebo for patients treated with PRALUENT 150 mg Q2W in the ITT population1

     

    PRALUENT

    (n=294)

    Placebo

    (n=148)

    Percentage change in HDL-C (± SD) Week 12 5.3 ± 0.9 0.6 ± 1.2
    Week 24 3.7 ± 0.8 -1.5 ± 1.1
    Percentage change in ApoA1 (± SD) Week 12 2.9 ± 0.7 1.5 ± 1.0
    Week 24 3.5 ± 0.7 0.5 ± 1.0
    Percentage change in ApoB (± SD) Week 12 -57.9 ± 1.2 2.1 ± 1.7
    Week 24 -53.3 ± 1.4 0.7 ± 2.0
    Percentage change in Lp(a) (± SD) Week 12 -28.7 ± 1.5 -1.7 ± 2.1
    Week 24 -30.4 ± 1.5 -4.3 ± 2.2
    Percentage change in fasting triglycerides (± SD) Week 12 -16.5 ± 1.8 3.6 ± 2.6
    Week 24 -15.1 ± 1.8 -1.0 ± 2.6

    Adapted from Castro Cabezas et al. 2025.

    Subgroup analyses: consistently greater LDL-C reduction with PRALUENT vs. ezetimibe or placebo achieved across patients with CAD + diabetes and established CADI

    CAD + diabetes:1

    62.6% LDL-C reduction 
    with PRALUENT 150 mg Q2W (n=113) 
    vs. 7.6% increase for placebo (n=48) 
    at Week 24 (P<0.0001)

    Absolute change in calculated LDL-C at 
    Week 24 was -72.3 mg/dL for PRALUENT 
    and -1.8 mg/dL for placebo.1

    Established CAD:1 

    61.7% LDL-C reduction  
    with PRALUENT 150 mg Q2W (n=246)  
    vs. 0.2% increase for placebo (n=114)  
    at Week 24 (P<0.0001)

    Absolute change in calculated LDL-C at  
    Week 24 was -73.3 mg/dL for PRALUENT  
    and -1.9 mg/dL for placebo.1

    Safety results

    PRALUENT was generally well tolerated, with a similar safety profile to control arms across all study groups

    • TEAEs were experienced by 76.5% and 74.8% of patients and SAEs were experienced by 13.7% and 15.7% of patients in the ezetimibe and PRALUENT (75/150 Q2W) groups, respectively1
    • TEAEs were experienced by 78.9% and 81.4% of patients and SAEs were experienced by 19.4% and 18.6% of patients in the placebo and PRALUENT (75/150 mg or 150 mg Q2W) groups, respectively1

    Adverse event profile for ASCVD patients with CAD or PAD + diabetes or established CAD treated with PRALUENT vs. ezetimibe and placebo1

      PRALUENT 75/150 mg Q2W vs. ezetimibe PRALUENT 75/150 mg Q2W vs. placebo
    PRALUENT (n=166) Ezetimibe (n=102) PRALUENT (n=468) Placebo (n=242)
    Patients with any TEAE, 
    n (%)
    124 (74.8) 78 (76.5) 381 (81.4) 191 (78.9)
    Patients with any 
    treatment-emergent SAE, 
    n (%)
    26 (15.7) 14 (13.7) 87 (18.6) 47 (19.4)
    Patients with any TEAE 
    leading to permanent treatment 
    discontinuation, n (%)
    15 (9.0) 14 (13.7) 33 (7.1) 14 (5.8)
    Patients with any TEAE 
    leading to death, n (%)
    2 (1.2) 1 (1.0) 4 (0.9) 1 (0.4)

    Adapted from Castro Cabezas et al. 2025.

    PRALUENT significantly reduced LDL-C levels vs. ezetimibe and placebo and was well tolerated among patients with ASCVD without previous ACS or stroke1

    Do you know when guidelines recommend initiating a PCSKi?

    Find out more here →

    Want to see more safety and efficacy data for PRALUENT?

    Find out more here →

    Indication, dosing and footnotes

    This material is intended for healthcare professionals only.

    PRALUENT (alirocumab) indication5

    Primary hypercholesterolaemia and mixed dyslipidaemia

    PRALUENT® is indicated in adults with primary hypercholesterolaemia (heterozygous familial and non-familial) or mixed dyslipidaemia, and in paediatric patient 3 years of age and older with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (HeFH) as an adjunct to diet:

    • in combination with the maximum tolerated dose of a statin with or without other lipid-lowering therapies or,
    • alone or in combination with other lipid-lowering therapies in patients who are statin-intolerant, or for whom a statin is contraindicated

    Dosing informations5

    The recommended PRALUENT doses are 75 mg once every 2 weeks, 150 mg once every 2 weeks, 300 mg once every 4 weeks (monthly), administered subcutaneously. All doses may be used for initiation of treatment.

    The dose of PRALUENT can be individualised based on patient characteristics, such as baseline LDL-C level, goal of therapy, and response to treatment. Lipid levels can be assessed 4 to 8 weeks after treatment initiation or titration, and dose adjusted accordingly (up-titration or down-titration). Intense LDL-C reduction is expected with PRALUENT 150 mg once every 2 weeks and 300 mg once every 4 weeks (monthly), where 150 mg once every 2 weeks is the maximum dose.

    For the treatment of HeFH in paediatric patients 8 years of age and older:

    - for patients with a body weight of less than 50 kg, the recommended dose is 150 mg once every 4 weeks and, if additional LDL-C reduction is needed, a dose of 75 mg once every 2 weeks is recommended

    - for patients with a body weight of 50 kg or more, the recommended dose is 300 mg once every 4 weeks and, if additional LDL-C reduction is needed, a dose of 150 mg every 2 weeks is recommended

    *Of 3,115 very high-risk patients (including people with HeFH) and people with established CVD but without ACS or stroke, 979 had CAD or PAD + diabetes or established CAD.1

    †PRALUENT is indicated in adults with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease to reduce cardiovascular risk by lowering LDL-C levels, as an adjunct to correction of other risk factors: in combination with the maximum tolerated dose of a statin with or without other lipid-lowering therapies or alone or in combination with other lipid-lowering therapies in patients who are statin-intolerant, or for whom a statin is contraindicated.5

    ‡PAD + diabetes comprised patients with diabetes and a medical history of intermittent claudication together with ankle-brachial index ≤0.90, or together with peripheral revascularisation procedure/surgery, or critical limb ischaemia together with peripheral revascularisation procedure/surgery or thrombolysis. CAD + diabetes comprised patients with diabetes and a medical history of acute myocardial infarction, unstable angina, CAD, or coronary revascularisation. Clinically established CAD was defined as having a medical history of at least one of the following: angina pectoris, coronary angioplasty, coronary arterial stent insertion, coronary artery bypass, coronary artery surgery, coronary endarterectomy, coronary revascularisation, percutaneous coronary intervention.¹

    ¥The subgroup PAD and diabetes was not analysed as a result of the small sample size (n=64).¹

    ACS = acute coronary syndrome; Apo A1 = apolipoprotein Al; Apo B = apolipoprotein B; ASCVD = atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; BMI = body mass index; CAD = coronary artery disease; CV = cardiovascular; CVD = cardiovascular disease; HbAlc = glycated haemoglobin; HDL-C = high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HeFH = heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia; ITT = intention-to-treat; LDL-C = low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; Lp(a) = lipoprotein (a); LS = least squared; PAD = peripheral artery disease; PCSK9 = proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9; PCSK9i = proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor; Q2W = every 2 weeks; SAE = serious adverse event; SD = standard deviation; SE = standard error; TEA = treatment-emergent adverse event.

    1. Castro Cabezas M, Orsini M, Tokgözoğlu L, et al. Efficacy and safety of alirocumab in patients with established atherosclerotic vascular disease before the first cardiovascular event: pooled analysis of phase 3 ODYSSEY studies. J Clin Lipidol. 2025;S1933-2874(25)00482-9.
    2. Mach F, Koskinas KC, Roeters van Lennep JE, et al. 2025 Focused Update of the 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias. Eur Heart J.2025;46(42):4359-4378.
    3. Schwartz GG, Steg PG, Szarek M, et al. Alirocumab and cardiovascular outcomes after acute coronary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(22):2097-2107.
    4. Yang J, Li Y, Liu Q, et al. Brief introduction of medical database and data mining technology in big data era. J Evid Based Med. 2020;13(1):57-69.
    5. PRALUENT (alirocumab) Summary of Product Characteristics. Gulf: sanofi-aventis groupe; Nov 2023.
    Related articles
    MAT-KW-2600108/V1/June 2026